With the World Athletics Championships concluded, I once again have both feet planted in the Eastern time zone. After not checking my feeds for nine days for fear of spoilers, I can finally share my thoughts—and more besides. It was a busy week, so this will be a busy blog, perhaps even like several blogs in one: an omniblog, if you will. And you will, because I just wrote it and you just read it. Buckle up.
Worlds 2025: An Incomplete and Completely Personal Review
Let’s start with the events nearest and dearest to my heart: 800 meters to the marathon. There is a ton to unpack across all events, distance or otherwise, but I’m not a news outlet obligated to provide equal or at all thorough coverage, so let’s keep this personal and let’s keep it quick:
- Cole Hocker is golden again! I had this outcome spoiled for me, despite my best efforts, but even watching the replay I wasn’t sure how he was going to do it. Things looked good when he went to the front early, like he did at USAs, but by the last lap he was piled high and deep in 12th place. It didn’t matter! What a thrilling finish. I can only wonder what might have been without his DQ in the 1500 meters. It was a completely fair call, and a tactical mistake on Hocker’s part to end up in a tricky situation like that in the first place, but could we be talking about a double gold medalist? The fact that the answer to that question is even close to “maybe” bodes well for the future of US distance running.
- Cole’s teammates in the 5000 missed the podium. For Grant Fisher, this was a regression to the mean after his double-bronze in Paris, and disappointing. For Nico Young, this was an improvement after his first global championships experience last year, and not all that different from where Grant was in 2022 (6th in the 5000 meters, 4th in the 10000 meters; Nico was 6th and 5th, respectively, in Tokyo). Buy the rumors, and next year you can sell the news.
- While we’re still talking long distance, Team USA really missed Alicia Monson this year. Still, I was happy to see my fellow New Jerseyan Josette Andrews finish sixth over 5000 meters! She is a recent convert to the longer distances, so it will be interesting to see if she can improve on that placing. Meanwhile, I was not at all happy to see busted doper Shelby Houlihan finish fourth. Bans for positive tests should be bans for life.
- Sage Hurta-Klecker ran the race of her life in the 800 meters! It wasn’t enough to make the podium, but nice to see as an American. Watching Keely Hodgkinson fade to silver (and nearly bronze) after looking invincible in the rounds was another big surprise.
- In an even bigger surprise, the USA men’s 800-meter team was absent from the final altogether. The global field is extremely deep, and a few tactical mistakes (and one teen phenom tiring out after a hyperextended spring season) were all it took to send three 1:42 guys home early. In the big picture, that’s a big disappointment. Looking closer, it’s a borderline miracle to have Donovan Brazier healthy again, and to have 16-year-old Cooper Lutkenhaus running 1:42 at all, so here’s hoping these guys are headed into the off-season with momentum and motivation instead of their tails between their legs.
- Cole Hocker was missed in the 1500 meters, but so too was his Paris teammate Yared Nuguse. With Jakob in poor form, we needed somebody to make this an honest race. Chaos is exciting, but it’s not meaningful.
- Speaking of Jakob: kudos to him for showing up at a fraction of his full power and competing anyway. He was leading the 5000 meters with a lap and a half to go! If anyone deserves a participation trophy, it’s him. Hopefully he has a restorative off-season and we see him back on form in 2026.
- It bears repeating just how crazy the men’s marathon finish was. It was one of the few events I watched live, and I picked Simbu to win the second he nearly missed the turn into the stadium. If it were me, I could never let something like that be the reason I lost such a close race. Better to dig as deep as possible to win it than face that existential nightmare. Now he won’t have to!
I said I would keep this quick, but it looks like the distance section of this recap ended up more tactical. Maybe I can power through the sprints:
- Vernon Norwood and Dalilah Muhammad as team captains were great choices!
- There’s a generational talent, and then there’s whatever you call Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone. 47.78 is another unreal performance from her! Excited to see what she does next.
- Melissa Jefferson-Wooden followed through on her dominant season and goes home with three no-doubt global golds. Finally, my wife’s most pressing question since the demise of Grand Slam Track can be answered—I’m sure the bonuses in her Nike contract will pay for her honeymoon.
- On the men’s side, Noah Lyles hung on to the 100-meter podium, dominated the 200 meters, and anchored another 4 x 100 relay gold. I think this is the most accurate reflection of his ability at a global championship so far. He’s a great 100-meter man, but outstanding over 200 meters. I understand that the 100 meters is a far more prestigious event, but if any of Bolt’s world records is vulnerable right now, it’s his 19.19. I think if Lyles focused on breaking that—he’s already at 19.31—he would fear no man over 100 meters simply as a byproduct of being so historically fast.
- One last thought on Lyles: he seems to have found the right balance between confidence and arrogance in his public persona after his spat with Kenny Bednarek. He was gracious finishing third in the 100 meters in a way I don’t think he would have been last year. At the same time, he’s still just as much the showman and drawing attention to the sport. Good for him.
- Botswana’s 4 x 400 relay team was dangerous and extremely fun to watch. The finish there was really interesting—I couldn’t help but wonder if Collen Kebinatshipi would still have found that final push to get past Rai Benjamin if Zakithi Nene, the South African anchor leg, hadn’t put pressure on him first. As the individual gold medalist, he probably would have! But I’m biased and I can dream.
So much action and that’s just on the track! As a non-field athlete, here’s what stood out to me on the inside of the oval:
- Mondo Duplantis still hasn’t found his ceiling, becoming the first man over 6.30 meters. His vaults are appointment television, and will be until gravity finally catches up with him.
- An injured Ryan Crouser is still the best thrower on the planet. Crouser is probably my favorite athlete on the field side of the sport for his invention of the Crouser Slide, and it’s so much fun to watch him be incredibly good at what he does.
- Both high jumps were some of the highest drama of the entire championships! There’s something about the vertical jumps that makes them instantly compelling, from a storytelling perspective, and each field had the dramatis personae to write a thrilling script. The winners were excellent, of course, but I also enjoyed the performances by silver medalists Woo Sang-hyeok and Maria Zodzik. Woo’s showmanship and dominance through the early heights elevated the competition, and Zodzik jumping a personal best on her last attempt with a global medal on the line is what a championship is all about!
- Those giant sponge rollers are an amazing invention! I couldn’t stop geeking out about them.
It was a lot of work keeping up with the World Championships this year, but worth it to witness such a glittering finale to the season. I owe a huge thank-you to my wife for being genuinely interested in the sport and watching a lot of the events with me. I promise we’ll be back to Bob’s Burgers and Dropout for the foreseeable future.
Zoom and Enhance: Fred Kerley Joins the Cynics
Fred Kerley was a notable and noticeable absence from the World Championships, but he made his presence felt by announcing he would participate in the Enhanced Games in 2026. This is really sad news, and not something I want to give too much oxygen to, but I have some thoughts—less so about Kerley, who has enough problems, and more about the existence of Enhanced.
It goes without saying that the biggest problem with the Enhanced Games is the risk to the athletes. The substances on the World Anti-Doping Agency’s ban list are banned for a reason. Specifically, they are banned for three reasons:
- they enhance or have the potential to enhance sports performance,
- they represent actual or potential health risks to the athlete, and
- they violate the spirit of sport.
Any substance that meets two of those three criteria is banned. Of course, it’s possible a substance skips the “risk to the athlete” part, but consider that caffeine, which does enhance performance (and is safe enough that most of us use it daily), isn’t banned. The list is not for the sort of risk-free low-hanging fruit that Brady Holmer would write about. These are the dark arts of the sporting world. Power comes with a price, and it’s a price the athletes pay—not the wealthy investors running this circus.
Aside from the obvious medical risk and the conflicts of interest that arise from it—for the athletes, doctors, and investors involved—the next biggest problem here is the worldview these people are promoting by promoting the Enhanced Games. It’s also the problem I feel more qualified to write about, given that I’m not a doctor but I’m still a human being who believes in fair play.
The existence of the Enhanced Games pushes the idea that it’s perfectly fine to bend the rules, take shortcuts, and even cheat, as long as you’re “smart” about it; you can dope, and should dope, as long as a doctor watches you do it. It’s a similar devil on your shoulder to the one that first appeared when ChatGPT and other Large Language Models broke big. It’s not cheating, they say, it’s the future. It’s about doing everything you can to get ahead. It’s about winning.
Never mind that LLMs (I will not call them AI) have already been shown to make you dumber as you offload all your thinking and creativity to a computer. You use it to write an email and you’re glad to be rid of the drudgery of office communication. Then you use it to write a birthday note for your spouse, or your kid uses it to write a history paper, and we’re getting rid of a whole lot more. Fred might do some drugs and run a PR. What’s the point? And what’s next? Nothing good!
If Fred Kerley breaks the world record, he’s done it for a big check and nothing else. In the eyes of all but the most cynical people, the result will be illegitimate. What happens in Vegas, for once, stays in Vegas.
If he doesn’t break the world record, then he’s done a lot of dangerous things to his body for nothing. Furthermore, he’s given regrettable plausibility to the argument that all of professional track, and maybe all of professional sports, is doped in some way. This is an exhausting and spiritually bankrupt take.
If you hang around the online spaces where track fans congregate, you know the cynics well. These individuals will Kool-Aid-Man their way into any thread on Twitter, or LetsRun.com, about any successful athlete to let everyone know that Sorry, actually, none of this is worth talking about because this person is doping.
These posters (and that’s all they are) are not privy to any information the rest of us don’t have—some leaked failed test or even training camp gossip—to back up their accusations. At best, there will be some flimsy “eye test” excuse; if you were a real ball knower like these people, if you were smart enough, you’d see it too.
These kinds of anonymous accusations are bad for the sport, in principle but also in practice; Josh Hoey was the unfortunate recipient of a lot of these smears while he put together a breakout season this year, and I have to admit I soured on him despite knowing it was all bullshit. It’s the same way political mudslinging works. You see a name covered in muck enough times, the next time you see it you’ll wipe your shoes. Josh Hoey doesn’t deserve a bad name until the day he fails a test, and no sooner. That’s innocent until proven guilty.
As if the cynics and their casual slander weren’t already a moral failure and an active harm to polite discourse, they’re also completely illogical. Let’s take the men’s 1500 meters as an example. Isaac Nader of Portugal won in an upset on the strength of a blistering kick—as all championship 1500-meter races are won, especially tactical ones. I didn’t have to look very hard to find anonymous trolls accusing him of doping. I even found, in the same thread, accusations against Hocker, who wasn’t even in the final, and Nuguse, who wasn’t even in Tokyo!
So, the men’s 1500-meter champion came out of nowhere with a ferocious kick to win the title; ergo, he must be doping. Now, rewind and run the race again. This time, someone else wins, coming out of nowhere with a ferocious kick. This is pretty likely, as there’s been a different champion in the men’s 1500 meters every year since 2019. Is the winner of the rerun doping? Or just Isaac Nader?
Now run it again. Someone else wins. Put Hocker back in the final (pretty please). The deck reshuffles again. We can only conclude that they’re all doping—which, of course, is exactly the point, except for the pesky technicality that no one in the field has failed a test. We have jumped, headlong and gleefully, over the edge of sanity and into a bottomless pit of conspiracy.
This kind of thinking is maddening, and it is bleak, and it is everywhere.
These are the only people who stand to benefit from the Enhanced Games. They are intellectually and morally lazy—fitting, as the kind of worldview that produces a kind of spectacle like Enhanced is lazy at its core.
Work has no value to these people. Outcomes, whether world records or quarterly earnings, are all that matter. This is a road to ruin, or at least personal misery.
I don’t know how to fix the kind of broken you have to be to think the Enhanced Games is a good idea. What I do know is that all work has inherent value in a way that all results do not.
To bring the personal back to this personal blog: If I BQ someday, that result has value to me, and the people who believe in me, and nobody else. The work I’ve done is far more valuable. The challenge of organizing my time, maintaining my motivation, and pushing my limits is remodeling me in real time. It makes me a better father and husband, a better friend and colleague, and a happier and healthier person. Sure, I’m a lot more tired at the end of the day, but I’m also a lot more satisfied and sure of myself. None of that is tied to a result. I could never BQ and still be better off.
Taking shortcuts, whether a small one like ChatGPT or a big, risky one like doping, robs you of the real reward. The Enhanced Games want that for their athletes, and for you, and for our culture. It’s a bleak, cynical future. Don’t let them do it.
This whole sad situation reminds me of a favorite quote of a friend of mine:
Our character is what we do when we think no one is looking.
— H. Jackson Brown, Jr.
It’s a great reminder of the value in doing the right thing, in doing the hard work. It makes you who you are.
I think it’s especially interesting to consider this quote in our current degraded (and degrading) age of social media—what do you do when everyone is looking at everyone, all the time? How does your character hold up? It’s easy to see how that kind of constant exposure, of yourself and to others, will make you cynical. Not only are people not perfect, not only are you not perfect, but everybody is very, very far from it. It’s ugly out there.
Do you shrug your shoulders and roll in the muck? Do you maybe invest millions of dollars into a crass, dangerous sporting event to convince others that it’s OK to get dirty like you?
Or do you do the work?
Your Regularly Scheduled Programming: This Week’s Training
Sunday: 13 miles, progressing from 7:15 down to 6:20. I didn’t intend to make this a workout, but my local Fleet Feet store was putting on a “Speed Shoe Rodeo” where I could demo the new Asics Metaspeed Sky Tokyo. I tagged along with someone training for a fall marathon who, it turned out, was faster than me. He did 18 miles and got down to 5:55 for the last 5 miles. I was happy to sip on the free Skratch and make chitchat with the shoe reps while he did that.
Monday: 4 miles extremely easy. I was very tired from back-to-back workouts on Saturday and Sunday.
Tuesday: 8 miles easy.
Wednesday: Hills with long rest like last week. Focusing on quality on these while I adapt to higher mileage.
Thursday: 7 miles easy. Slept well, but felt bad.
Friday: 7 miles easy. Slept terribly after staying up late for a Vampire Weekend concert, but felt surprisingly decent.
Saturday: 4 x 1 mile at tempo pace (6:10 average) with 1 minute rest. I wanted this to be another 4 miles continuous like last week, but I knew pretty quickly I didn’t have my best and adjusted the workout to suit. I honestly didn’t think I’d get to 4 reps, so this was a victory.
This Week: 55 miles. It was a very busy week with the concert on Thursday and the extra hard effort on Sunday, but I made it through in one piece. That’s a nice confidence boost, but I am still planning to take a down week this week to properly recover and soak up the last three weeks at 50+ miles. I’m looking forward to the next push.
Baby: My son seems to be winning his battle against the sniffles and is getting his energy back. He was well-behaved for Grandma while Mom and Dad went to the Vampire Weekend concert. I call this Grandma Mode, and my wife and I are simultaneously grateful and a little jealous. He also had a great visit with friends on Saturday, which I spent on the playground with my friend’s two kids, 6 and 3. Needless to say I was very sore on Sunday morning. You can read about that next week.